Manual testing is a software testing technique where test cases are executed and verified by human testers without the use of automated testing tools or scripts.
120 Days
Every second week
Classroom/Remote
In the context of software testing, “Manual Testing” refers to the process of manually executing test cases without the use of automation tools.
Manual testers play a crucial role in ensuring the quality and functionality of software applications before they are released to users.
Here's a breakdown of the key components and technologies involved in Manual Testing.
Test case management tools are used to create, organize, and manage test cases. These tools help testers maintain a structured approach to testing and ensure comprehensive test coverage.
Bug tracking tools are used to report and track defects or issues found during the testing process. Testers use these tools to communicate with developers and other team members about the status and resolution of bugs.
Understanding the software requirements is a critical aspect of manual testing. Testers need to review and comprehend the project’s functional and non-functional requirements to design appropriate test cases.
Test planning involves defining the scope, objectives, and approach of the testing process. Testers need to create a test strategy that outlines how testing will be conducted, resources required, and the timeline for testing activities.
Manual testers use various test case design techniques to ensure that test scenarios are comprehensive and cover different aspects of the software application. Techniques like boundary value analysis, equivalence partitioning, and decision tables are commonly employed.
During test execution, testers follow the test cases and perform interactions with the software application. Any defects or deviations from expected behavior are documented and reported in the bug tracking system.
Regression testing is the process of retesting a software application after making changes to verify that the changes do not adversely impact existing functionality. Manual testers often perform regression testing to ensure the software’s stability and integrity.
Exploratory testing involves ad-hoc testing where testers explore the application without predefined test cases to identify defects, usability issues, and user experience concerns.
User acceptance testing is performed by end-users or stakeholders to ensure that the application meets their requirements and expectations before it is released to production.
Manual testers maintain test documentation, including test plans, test cases, test scripts, test data, and test execution reports. This documentation helps track progress, share findings, and serve as a reference for future testing.
Test the shopping cart functionality of an e-commerce website. Add items to the cart, update quantities, and verify the final checkout process.
Create a social media platform with user profiles, friend connections, posting, commenting, and notification functionalities.
Test a weather forecast application to ensure that it displays accurate weather data for different locations and dates.
Test the logout functionality of a web application. Ensure that users are successfully logged out and that they cannot access restricted pages after logout.
Manual testing is preferred over automated testing in scenarios where the software application has frequent changes, lacks stable requirements, or is still in the early stages of development. It can also be suitable for usability testing and ad-hoc exploratory testing.
Some challenges in manual testing include time-consuming test execution, human error, difficulty in testing large datasets, and the inability to repeat tests exactly the same way each time.
Yes, manual testing can be integrated into Agile or DevOps environments. Manual testers can work in parallel with developers to perform exploratory testing and ensure that new features and changes are thoroughly validated.
In manual testing, tests are executed manually by testers, while in automated testing, tests are performed using automated testing tools and scripts. Manual testing requires human intervention, while automated testing is performed by machines.
While automated testing can significantly enhance the efficiency and repeatability of testing, it cannot completely replace manual testing. Manual testing is valuable for exploring user interactions, assessing usability, and identifying defects that may be challenging for automated scripts to detect.